Search for: "i4i Limited Partnership v. Microsoft Corporation" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2009, 12:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the trial court verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff i4i Limited Partnership and against Microsoft Corporation in the amount of $240,000,000. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm by Rantanen
Today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, in which Microsoft has challenged the Federal Circuit’s clear and convincing evidence standard for overcoming the presumption of patent validity set forth in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:08 am by Maureen Cosgrove
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] unanimously ruled [opinion, PDF] against Microsoft [corporate website] Thursday in Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership [docket], holding that a patent will be invalidated only if the challenging party meets the "clear and convincing evidence" standard. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:29 am by The Docket Navigator
"On appeal in this case, the Federal Circuit held, in light of its intervening opinion in i4i Limited Partnership v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:11 am by Stefanie Levine
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:11 am by Stefanie Levine
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:22 am by Gene Quinn
US Supreme Court Accepts Microsoft Appeal in i4i CaseEarlier today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 7:41 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 5,787,449 owned by i4i Limited Partnership and entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANIPULATING THE ARCHITECTURE AND CONTENT OF A DOCUMENT SEPARATELY FROM EACH OTHER. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:44 am by Kiran Bhat
” Yesterday Microsoft filed its reply brief in Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership, scheduled for Monday, April 18. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Dukes (on the Rule 23(b)(2) issue), were unexpected.Got Our Attention, But Earth Didn't MoveMicrosoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership: Although Microsoft asked the court to invalidate the long-established clear and convincing evidence standard for patent validity challenges, the court remained steadfast and left the current standard alone.Flores-Villar v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:39 am by Kali Borkoski
” At The American Lawyer’s Corporate Counsel website, David Bario reports on Monday’s grant of certiorari in Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Jake Ward
 Judge Michel also believes that the SCOTUS will likely weaken the presumption of validity in case of Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, presently before the court. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Gene Quinn
Although not all agreeing on the reason, all of the Justices participating in the case also agreed in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (2011) that the presumption of validity bestowed upon a patent by 35 U.S.C. 282 requires that an invalidity defense be proven by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: Supreme Court affirms high standard of proving patents invalid – Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade) (Patently-O)  (IPBiz) (IAM) (IPBiz) (Patentology) (ipwars) (Patents Post Grant) (The Prior Art) (Patent Docs) (IPKat) (PatLit) (IPblog) (Patently Biotech) (Maier & Maier) (IPBiz) (Patent Law Practice Center) (Inventive Step) District Court Nevada:… [read post]